Author: Lar Mader
Date: 08:02:05 04/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2005 at 10:20:30, Mike Byrne wrote: >On April 01, 2005 at 03:25:48, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On March 31, 2005 at 16:08:46, Lar Mader wrote: >> >>>Has anyone had any experience with, or done any testing of, ChessGenius 2.x ARM >>>vs. ChessTiger 15.x for the Palm. The ChessGenius ARM program seems pretty >>>strong, but I think that ChessTiger was stronger than the non-ARM version of >>>ChessGenius. Also, any guesses as to ELO (that is, SSDF relative ELO)? >>> >>>-= Lar >> >>from my testing the NON arm tiger is stronger then the ARM genius. >>hardware is not anything. > >300 Mhz ArM genius is not stronger than a 42Mhz Tiger ?-- I think you're >mistaken. I can underclock my PPC Genius to 300 Mhz and compare over the >weekend. If you mean that you are going to compare a 300 Mhz machine running Genius to a 42 Mhz machine running Tiger, I'm not sure that is what we want to test (unless you are responding to the comment that "...hardware is not anything."). At least I am more interested in which program plays stronger on the same machine. For example my Palm Tungsten E can run the ARM version of Genius and the non ARM Tiger. So I'm interested in which performs better in this environment (same hardware). -= Lar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.