Author: Bahram Namjou
Date: 19:34:48 04/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
If you looking for winning buy SH9. It is basically has been programmed to win no matter what...sometimes by I can say cheating maneuvers? such as repetitive movements or abusing tablebases at the end games...That's why i usually don't like this engine despite winning!... On April 04, 2005 at 07:10:10, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >Considerable time has passed since the release of both Junior9 and Shredder9 and >i want some opinions since i am planning to buy one of the two programs from >chessbase. > >1) Which is the better of the two in terms of analysis output. I heard about >Junior's emphasis on interesting moves in dynamic positions. is it true that >Junior is a better engine for analysis purpose than Shredder9? > >2) Which is the better of the two engines in terms of pure playing quality ? or >is it that they are both very close? Which one is more towards perfection? > >3) Does new versions(latest copies) of Junior9 from Chessbase contain the bug >that was discussed here? > >4) Is it true that Shredder is not a good engine playing against Humans? > >Regards > >Vikrant
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.