Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:31:02 04/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2005 at 11:47:35, Ted Summers wrote: >If for Deep Junior 9 we should add +40 Elo, Then for Deep Shredder 9 how much >should we add? > >Selective Search (Eric Hallsworth) > >http://www.elhchess.demon.co.uk/ehss.htm > >BCF Elo.. Program > >266 2732 Shredder8 >264 2718 Shredder9 (only results from 54 games in, so early days!) >263 2712 Shredder7.04 >262 2702 Junior9 (Deep Junior9 add +40 Elo on dual/1000, +70 on quad/1000)) >261 2693 Junior8 >260 2688 Fritz8. (Deep Fritz7/8 add +40 Elo on dual/1000, +70 on quad/1000); >Fritz8-Bilbao probably +20 Elo >260 2684 Hiarcs9 (Hiarcs9.6 MAC appears to be +30/40 Elo improvement) >260 2682 Fritz7 >257 2660 Chess Tiger15 >257 2657 Chess Tiger14 >257 2657 Gandalf 6 >256 2655 Chessmaster9000 >255 2640 Hiarcs8 >251 2612 Rebel Century4 >251 2611 Ruffian2 (lower than Ruffian1.05 was rated!?) The answer to everything is 42 (HHGTTG). But if you don't like that answer you can feed the data to Elostat, let Chessbase compute it, or try Remi's BayesElo program. Or you can just set it to any number you like. The actual value is irrelevant. Only the distances from other entities in the same pool of measurements matters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.