Author: Reynolds Takata
Date: 19:41:01 02/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 1999 at 20:13:33, James Robertson wrote: >On February 02, 1999 at 09:39:19, Reynolds Takata wrote: > >[snip] > >>>It is like what Kasparov said about Deep Blue after he lost. He said that Deep >>>Blue would get crushed in normal tournament play, because Deep Blue was a >>>machine taylored to defeat Gary Kasparov and only Gary Kasparov. >> >>Well i'm sorry to say, that the simple act of adding accurate and strong >>positional information to a program doesn't make it weaker. Further i'm sure if >>deep blue was going to play INVITATIONAL tournament chess just like Kasparov, >>then Deep blue would prepare for the 10-15 players at the event, just like >>Kasparov , had a prepared line and strategy for EVERY opponent at Wijk AAN zee. > >Then why is preparing an opening and strategy against a computer different? ???? The point is just that, The GM is going to prepare an opening strategy for H7, here is just a defense that H7 should be able to prepare opening strategys against the GM. The person who i was responding to wanted to claim that h7 SHOULDN"T prepare while the GM should have free range to prepare against H7. >James > >[snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.