Author: Marc D
Date: 07:42:47 04/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2005 at 10:37:19, Günther Simon wrote: >On April 07, 2005 at 08:40:46, Marc D wrote: > >>On April 07, 2005 at 08:23:50, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>I think yes >>> >>>[d]4RQ2/5p2/2q2kp1/3p4/3P2PP/8/1K6/8 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Is there any program find it (in less than 30 min) ? >> >> >>Analysis by X3D Fritz: >> >>1. +- (2.71): 1...Dc6-b5+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db5-c4+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc4xd4+ 4.Kd2-e1 Dd4-g1+ >>2. +- (#10): 1...Dc6-b6+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db6-c6+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc6xe8 4.Df8xe8 >>3. +- (#9): 1...Dc6-b7+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db7-c6+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc6xe8 4.Df8xe8 >>4. +- (#7): 1...Dc6xe8 2.Df8xe8 Kf6-g7 3.g4-g5 f7-f5 4.De8-e7+ Kg7-g8 5.h4-h5 >>5. +- (#4): 1...Dc6-c1+ 2.Kb2xc1 >> >>After forcing Qc3+ this: >> >>Analysis by X3D Fritz: >> >>2.Kb2xc3 g6-g5 3.Df8-h6# >> +- (#2) Tiefe: 3/16 00:00:00 > > >The question was to find a perpetual draw, not the >quickest help mate (: > >Guenther I don't know how this could be done since all engines (i started) show a favour for white. Neither did any perpetual check (which is not possible) work out. I thought due to this there is no perputual draw chance and i should instead post that it could be actually mate. Sorry my fault :-( Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.