Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 08:10:51 04/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2005 at 10:42:47, Marc D wrote: >On April 07, 2005 at 10:37:19, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On April 07, 2005 at 08:40:46, Marc D wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2005 at 08:23:50, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>> >>>>I think yes >>>> >>>>[d]4RQ2/5p2/2q2kp1/3p4/3P2PP/8/1K6/8 b - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Is there any program find it (in less than 30 min) ? >>> >>> >>>Analysis by X3D Fritz: >>> >>>1. +- (2.71): 1...Dc6-b5+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db5-c4+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc4xd4+ 4.Kd2-e1 Dd4-g1+ >>>2. +- (#10): 1...Dc6-b6+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db6-c6+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc6xe8 4.Df8xe8 >>>3. +- (#9): 1...Dc6-b7+ 2.Kb2-c2 Db7-c6+ 3.Kc2-d2 Dc6xe8 4.Df8xe8 >>>4. +- (#7): 1...Dc6xe8 2.Df8xe8 Kf6-g7 3.g4-g5 f7-f5 4.De8-e7+ Kg7-g8 5.h4-h5 >>>5. +- (#4): 1...Dc6-c1+ 2.Kb2xc1 >>> >>>After forcing Qc3+ this: >>> >>>Analysis by X3D Fritz: >>> >>>2.Kb2xc3 g6-g5 3.Df8-h6# >>> +- (#2) Tiefe: 3/16 00:00:00 >> >> >>The question was to find a perpetual draw, not the >>quickest help mate (: >> >>Guenther > > >I don't know how this could be done since all engines (i started) show a favour >for white. Engines don't play perfect chess :) >Neither did any perpetual check (which is not possible) work out. "Sure" or "May be" ? :) >I thought due to this there is no perputual draw chance and i should instead >post that it could be actually mate. > >Sorry my fault :-( > >Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.