Author: Roman Hartmann
Date: 10:45:06 04/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2005 at 16:45:44, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On April 10, 2005 at 16:10:03, Marc D wrote: > >> >>Its hard to beat Hydra because of its hardware power. >>I assume if Hydra could play on a normal system it wouldn't be that >>strong... >> > >Yeah, the whole truth is what you said............ >The "myth" of Hydra is based on the ability to use such hardware and not because >of any revolutionary Chess-algorithms...... Why is Hydra a myth? It seems to be the strongest playing chess machine up to this day. If you want to talk about a myth you should talk about Deep Blue which played a few games against Kasparov and was quickly put away after that. It would have been too embarassing to IBM if Fritz or Hiarcs running on a tiny pentium would have beaten that hardware monster. The Hydra team isn't afraid to play other computers, obviously. Of course Hydra is strong because it's making use of powerfull hardware but keep in mind that most other engines just don't scale as nicely as Hydra does. So Hydra cannot be blamed that other engines just can't make use of powerfull hardware. Roman
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.