Author: James Robertson
Date: 09:12:35 02/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 1999 at 22:41:01, Reynolds Takata wrote: >On February 02, 1999 at 20:13:33, James Robertson wrote: > >>On February 02, 1999 at 09:39:19, Reynolds Takata wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>>It is like what Kasparov said about Deep Blue after he lost. He said that Deep >>>>Blue would get crushed in normal tournament play, because Deep Blue was a >>>>machine taylored to defeat Gary Kasparov and only Gary Kasparov. >>> >>>Well i'm sorry to say, that the simple act of adding accurate and strong >>>positional information to a program doesn't make it weaker. Further i'm sure if >>>deep blue was going to play INVITATIONAL tournament chess just like Kasparov, >>>then Deep blue would prepare for the 10-15 players at the event, just like >>>Kasparov , had a prepared line and strategy for EVERY opponent at Wijk AAN zee. >> >>Then why is preparing an opening and strategy against a computer different? > >???? The point is just that, The GM is going to prepare an opening strategy >for H7, here is just a defense that H7 should be able to prepare opening >strategys against the GM. The person who i was responding to wanted to claim >that h7 SHOULDN"T prepare while the GM should have free range to prepare against >H7. Ok... so we both agree that both players should prepare? (This may be the first agreement in a while, and I hope it can stay that way!) James >>James >> >>[snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.