Author: Günther Simon
Date: 00:17:56 04/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2005 at 19:31:19, Earl Fuller wrote: >On April 14, 2005 at 09:04:32, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On April 14, 2005 at 08:38:02, Earl Fuller wrote: >> >>>Hi Kurt, i'm sure your right. I was just amazed at how well this Genius program >>>did against Shredder. I didn't believe it would win one game, but i was wrong. I >>>have Shredder playing on a new AMD 2200+ with a 1,000 megs of ram, with Genius >>>on an old P200 with 64 megs of ram,___hummm, i wonder if Shredder is using to >>>much ram, ?______well, in any case i'll play around with it and see if i can't >>>inprove Shredders score. >>>earl >> >>How much ram does your AMD have physically? What time control do you use? >>Do you use HT on that machine? >>I see serious flaws on the horizon... >>(first guess: your machine swaps because you have not enough ram for >>setting up Shredder with 1000MB, second guess: you use a very fast time control, >>when your hash setting might hurt) >> >>Guenther > > >This Machine is an AMD 2200+ with 1,000 megs of Ram, a 120 gig hard drive, it >uses XP Pro. Yes, it has a 1,000 megs of ram and the Shredder program uses 409 >megs of this ram for hash tables. No, there is no swapping to the hard drive. >And i use just 5 seconds per move settings for both programs. >There is hardly anything on the hard drive and nothing running in the >background,___so___:) >earl Try to reduce your hash for such a speed time control of only 5 sec per move, Shredder never has the time to fill that 409MB hash. BTW why that strange number of 409? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.