Author: Rob Basham
Date: 15:14:08 04/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2005 at 10:12:49, F. Huber wrote: >On April 16, 2005 at 09:33:11, Rob Basham wrote: > >>On April 16, 2005 at 08:09:32, Ross Boyd wrote: >> >>> >>>> Here's the full game... it doesn't reflect the 1850's normal play. It seemed to >>>be having a real bad day. And I was playing for a certain QP opening setup that >>>Flohr once used... which explains some strange passive play on white's part. >>>The Tandy didn't seem to mind if I wasted time... >>> >>>Correction, I meant Colle, not Flohr. >> >>Fritz 8 shows a mate in 10... >> >>Nice ending! >> >>Rob > >ChestUCI confirms the mate in 10: > >ChestUCI Ver.4.1: >CPU: Celeron 400MHz >FEN: r1b3k1/pp3r2/1qp1pP1Q/2b5/8/2P5/PPB1RPPP/R5K1 w - - >Search for Special-Mate [C0/R3/K3/P8/X41] in 10 ... (Hash=48MB) > 10 02:02 2.638.116 62.633 +M10 1.Te5 >Search completed ... (Time=147.53s) >Mate in 10 found ! (02:27) >1.Re5 Bxf2+ 2.Kh1 Bh4 3.Rh5 Bxf6 4.Bh7+ Rxh7 5.Qg6+ Bg7 6.Rxh7 Qc7 7.Rd1 Qxh2+ >8.Kxh2 Kf8 9.Qxg7+ Ke8 10.Rh8# >1 Solution (Mate in 10) > >Regards, >Franz. Thanks! So it is a mate in 10 after all.....:-) Rob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.