Author: Darrel Briley
Date: 18:12:00 04/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2005 at 04:36:41, Ingo Bauer wrote: >>Yes, right after getting Shredder9 UCI I tried this postion out, and Be4 was >>found rather quickly. I think afterwards someone else pointed out that >>Shredder8 found the move too with a little more time (perhaps a couple of >>minutes total). >> >>Shredder9 UCI on AthlonXP 2600+, 1GB RAM, Hashtable 256: > >> 14/29 0:03 +0.44++ 1.Be4 (2.162.507) 553 > >Hi > >S9 is good, but not that good ;-) ! 3 sec is with learning! If you delete that >S9 needs longer, but still finds it! > >S9 on a XP@2500MHz: > >[D]r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - - > >Engine: Shredder 9 UCI (256 MB) >by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen > >12/39 0:01 +0.86 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 > 4.Kf1 Qxe6 5.fxe6 Ke7 6.Be4 Rd8 (791.511) 575 > >13/34 0:02 +0.94 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 > 4.Kf1 Qxe6 5.fxe6 Ke7 6.Be4 Rd8 > 7.Ke2 Kd6 8.Ra6+ Ke7 9.Ke3 g6 (1.422.387) 587 > >14/41 0:04 +1.00 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 > 4.Kf1 Qxe6 5.fxe6 Ke7 6.Be4 Rd8 > 7.Ra7 Kd6 8.Ra6+ Ke7 9.Rc6 Bd6 > 10.Rb6 Rb8 (2.618.171) 598 > >15/42 0:07 +0.75-- 1.Qb6 Rxa2 (4.741.441) 608 > >15/44 0:10 +0.47 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Ra8 3.Ra5 Rxa5 > 4.bxa5 Qb8 5.Qc6 b4 6.cxb4 Qxb4 7.a6 Qd2 (6.308.819) 608 > >16/43 0:20 +0.47 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Ra8 3.Ra5 Rxa5 > 4.bxa5 Qb8 5.Qxb8+ Bxb8 6.Kf2 Kf8 > 7.Kf3 Ba7 8.d6 Ke8 9.Ke4 (11.922.360) 586 > >17/45 0:33 +0.40 1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Ra8 3.Ra5 Rxa5 > 4.bxa5 Qb8 5.Kf1 Qxb6 6.axb6 Kf7 > 7.g4 Ke7 8.b7 Kd7 (19.517.819) 588 > >17/45 0:44 +0.41++ 1.Ra6 (25.511.311) 578 > >17/45 1:04 +0.41 1.Ra6 e4 (36.793.096) 573 > >17/45 1:09 +0.42++ 1.Be4 (40.007.417) 573 > >17/45 1:37 +0.57 1.Be4 Rcb8 2.Ra6 Qd8 3.Kf1 Rxa6 (56.169.402) 574 > >18/40 1:58 +0.56 1.Be4 Rcb8 2.Ra6 Qd8 3.Kf1 Kf8 > 4.R1a5 Kg8 5.Ra2 Kf8 6.Qe3 Kg8 (67.835.082) 573 > >19/45 3:12 +0.58 1.Be4 Rcb8 2.Ra6 Kh7 3.Kh2 (109.338.394) 568 > >20/45 4:28 +0.59 1.Be4 Rcb8 2.Ra6 Qd8 3.Kf1 Rxa6 (152.405.544) 567 > >best move: Bc2-e4 time: 5:38.313 min n/s: 566.684 CPU 97.9% n/s(1CPU): >578.839 nodes: 191.699.153 > >Bye >Ingo Yes, you're right :) But I didn't want to delete my learn file. I should've noted the fact.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.