Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Great CM9000 Showdown at 40 in 80 (FINAL STANDINGS)

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 12:57:33 04/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2005 at 10:01:01, Sedat wrote:

>On April 17, 2005 at 06:20:21, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>THE GREAT CM9000 SHOWDOWN!
>>
>>Athlon XP1900+
>>128mb hash each
>>3,4,5 men tablebases
>>Ponder on
>>No opening books
>>42 rounds (2 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating
>>
>>
>>FINAL STANDINGS
>>
>>25.5	- Minotaur
>>24.5	- Slayer 2b
>>24.0	- Gladiator
>>24.0	- Mv2.5
>>23.5	- SKR
>>23.0	- Pillen
>>22.5	- Apex
>>22.5	- TO5
>>22.0	- Judge II
>>22.0	- Mapi
>>21.5	- R1
>>20.5	- Surak 8c
>>20.5	- Slayer
>>20.0	- Yoda
>>19.5	- Justice
>>19.5	- R2
>>18.5	- Judge
>>18.5	- Assassin
>>18.5	- RIX
>>18.0	- Default
>>17.5	- Minotaur 2
>>16.0	- Alliance
>
>Hello Graham,
>
>Thanks a lot for your big efforts !!!
>
>After this TOURNAMENT clearly we can say:
>- CM9 Gladiator is one strongest CM9000 setting !
>
>
>And here is another proof of CM9 Gladiator strenght :
>
>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating40m40min.html
>
>Best,
>Sedat


Hi Sedat,

yes - Gladiator performed very strongly. Interesting too that Gladiator uses
selectivity 10 whereas most of the other top settings use selectivity 12.
Thanks for your kind comments. I also follow your tournaments with great
interest even though I probably don't give feedback as often as I should!

Regards, Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.