Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:09:32 04/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2005 at 15:49:50, Graham Banks wrote: >On April 17, 2005 at 10:50:17, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On April 17, 2005 at 06:20:21, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>THE GREAT CM9000 SHOWDOWN! >> >>Nice..........! I'm impressed by the position of the default setting. Too >>bad.... >> >>But how did you play with Ponder=ON on a single machine.......... Or it was a >>Dual.....? >> >>And one favour: Can you please e-mail me all the Wb2UCi.eng or the CMP files >>(depending on what GUI you have run the tournament (really it was Chessbase or >>Chessmaster's GUI?)), for all the participants you have used for this >>tournament.....? (In a ZIP file for example........) >>I want to run the exact same tournament with books or with other opponents >>too...... >> >>gtsavdar@auth.gr > > >Hi George, > >the email is on the way! I've included logos also. >Yes I did use ponder on on a single processor machine to add more interest for >myself. Experiments previously conducted by Volker Pittlik indicate that >performances are relatively the same whether you use ponder on or ponder off. > Thanks for the e-mail........! Hmmmm, in that case i would prefer ponder to be off, as i'm not sure at all that this doesn't affect engine performance.........Actually i believe that Ponder=ON at a single CPU, destoys any comparison that can be done about engine's strength, but with all engines be the "The King.exe" i'm not sure if this still exists here.........?!?!?!? I guess since all engines were the same, then the % CPU all were given, was the same so there wasn't any problem......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.