Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Blast from the past - Feng Hsu

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 18:51:46 04/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2005 at 12:50:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

-- nonsense

You  and Kasparov do not understand how Corporate Amercia works.  IBM Corporate
could not have cared less if they won or lost -- they were doing this for PR --
period.  IBM Chess team wanted to win, that was obvious.   When Kasparov
challeged IBM Chess team publicly of cheating,  KASPAROV KILLED THE GOLDEN EGG
AND BIT THE HAND THAT WAS FEEDING HIM with IBM Corporate (not neccessarily IBM
Chess Team).  It is that simple.  Fortune 50 companies never want any bad PR
period and especially if they are the paying for the PR.   They were paying Hsu
and his team, they were providing the sponsorship and match awards.  They were
paying for the hotels, etc.  It was their money.  If I was IBM Chairmen, I would
have said that's it too.  Not because that Kasparov is acting like an ass or
because IBM won, but in Corporate America , you do not things that are publicly
embarrassing or could be perceived in that light.  Kasparov's accusation was
indirectly an accusation against IBM Corporate as well - Kasparov post match
actions nixed any possibililty of a rematch immediately.

Kasparov acted liked a horse's ass after he loss which is not totally uncommon
for him when he loses.  People understand that, most World Champions do not like
to lose and are not on their best behavior when they do.

Part of problem is that Professional Chess is and has been so corrupted at the
top  orgnization level anyway and Kasparov was used to operating in that kind of
a corrupted enviroment.  He was either given bad advice by his handlers or he
simply did not think of how IBM would react to his serious accusation.  He
became non-grata with IBM as soon as he made the accusations.  In essense , his
last move was very bad - just like a bad chess move - because he did not think
ahead of the all the possible outcomes and consequences.




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.