Author: Roger Brown
Date: 08:32:23 04/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2005 at 10:34:36, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi Uri :-), > >there are some more reasons. > >For example we do not want to give results after only 100 games. Many people >trust in this and then buy and maybe are disappointed when rating drops after >more than 500 games for example. > >Secondly there is a combination of CEGT and ATL rating list available. Some >people might suspect that we could give too positive results for Ktulu because >of some cooperation we are having with Frank. I can only assure that CEGT is >independent with its own list on our websites, but Frank is allowed to use our >results later for better overall statistical values. > >Third point: we are playing under Fritz GUI, that means that some of the >disadvantages you have with Winboard do not show up. Maybe it would be a good >idea to watch different ratings under all GUI´s in that case until a bugfix is >out. > >And most important: we want to give reliable and trustworthy results. > > >Best Regards >Heinz Hello Heinz, An entirely commendable approach and a very good response. Interested in running for office? We could use a few more honest and objective politicians....and accountants and doctors and teachers and CEO's and.... :-) Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.