Author: chandler yergin
Date: 09:34:41 04/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2005 at 12:03:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 20, 2005 at 11:58:40, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On April 20, 2005 at 08:42:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 19, 2005 at 22:02:32, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>Let's put some stuff to rest here.. >>>> >>>>Quoting from FENG-HSIUNG HSU's Book >>>> >>>>"Behind Deep Blue" >>>> >>>>Pg 207 >>>> The match contract explicitly obliged the Deep Blue team to provide, when >>>>requested, the scores of all our public tournament games. >>>> >>>>True, he did not have access to games played by the newest version of the >>>>program. >>>> >>>>We wanted to be fair, but to give Garry games from our pre-match training would >>>>have placed us at a serious disadvantage. >>>> >>>>Pg 219. >>>> >>>>The chess books I had only gave cursory treatments on the positional play of the >>>>Queen >>>>After this game Joe wrote some simple code on where the Queen should be placed. >>>> >>>>Pg 220. >>>> >>>>An automatic tuning run for the evaluation function pointed out to us that the >>>>weighting for one class of King Safety should be increased. >>>> >>>>Pg224. >>>> >>>>The morning before game 2, the team debated whether we should make changes >>>>to Deep Blue's evaluation function. Joe had already 'fixed' the bug responsible >>>>for the last move in game 1, but there were other changes we needed to look >>>>into. >>>> >>>>Pg 238. >>>> >>>>The penalty for Bishops being shut out from the game was increased after this >>>>game. >>>> >>>>Pg 243. >>>> >>>>Granting him direct access to Deep Blue's game logs would be equivilent to >>>>giving him Deep Blue's silicon head on a silver platter, with $700,000 on the >>>>side. >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, enough Quotes.. >>>>Read the BOOK! >>> >>> >>>I read the book. I read it before it was published in fact, since he asked me >>>to proofread the thing before it was completed... >>> >>>grow up... >> >> >> Then you KNOW it was NOT a fair Contest! > > >Because you say so? > >Kasparov dictated the rules. he lost He did not dictate the rules; he "agreed to" the Rules, a big difference! The Rules were stacked against him from the beginning. > >get over it Admit your Bias towards Kasparov, and your lack of objectivity & logic, and perhaps I will. I think you owe Kasparov, the Greatest Player an apology! > >Got any kinfolk in Canada?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.