Author: chandler yergin
Date: 11:41:54 04/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2005 at 12:38:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 20, 2005 at 12:34:41, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On April 20, 2005 at 12:03:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2005 at 11:58:40, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>>On April 20, 2005 at 08:42:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 19, 2005 at 22:02:32, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Let's put some stuff to rest here.. >>>>>> >>>>>>Quoting from FENG-HSIUNG HSU's Book >>>>>> >>>>>>"Behind Deep Blue" >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 207 >>>>>> The match contract explicitly obliged the Deep Blue team to provide, when >>>>>>requested, the scores of all our public tournament games. >>>>>> >>>>>>True, he did not have access to games played by the newest version of the >>>>>>program. >>>>>> >>>>>>We wanted to be fair, but to give Garry games from our pre-match training would >>>>>>have placed us at a serious disadvantage. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 219. >>>>>> >>>>>>The chess books I had only gave cursory treatments on the positional play of the >>>>>>Queen >>>>>>After this game Joe wrote some simple code on where the Queen should be placed. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 220. >>>>>> >>>>>>An automatic tuning run for the evaluation function pointed out to us that the >>>>>>weighting for one class of King Safety should be increased. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg224. >>>>>> >>>>>>The morning before game 2, the team debated whether we should make changes >>>>>>to Deep Blue's evaluation function. Joe had already 'fixed' the bug responsible >>>>>>for the last move in game 1, but there were other changes we needed to look >>>>>>into. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 238. >>>>>> >>>>>>The penalty for Bishops being shut out from the game was increased after this >>>>>>game. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pg 243. >>>>>> >>>>>>Granting him direct access to Deep Blue's game logs would be equivilent to >>>>>>giving him Deep Blue's silicon head on a silver platter, with $700,000 on the >>>>>>side. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, enough Quotes.. >>>>>>Read the BOOK! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I read the book. I read it before it was published in fact, since he asked me >>>>>to proofread the thing before it was completed... >>>>> >>>>>grow up... >>>> >>>> >>>> Then you KNOW it was NOT a fair Contest! >>> >>> >>>Because you say so? >>> >>>Kasparov dictated the rules. he lost >> >>He did not dictate the rules; he "agreed to" the Rules, >>a big difference! >>The Rules were stacked against him from the beginning. > >Shows your ignorance. _HE_ set the rules. _HE_ was the one IBM wanted to play >for max P/R exposure. He got _everything_ he asked for. Kasparov played by the Rules of Chess. All other rules were "mutually" agreed upon. Kasparov asked for NO special treatment! I am not impressed by your 'brilliance', nor baffled by your BS! Your bias against Kasparov is apparent! Your antagonism against those who disagree with you is very apparent! > > >> >> >>> >>>get over it >> >>Admit your Bias towards Kasparov, and your lack of objectivity >>& logic, and perhaps I will. > >Right after you admit your ignorance about computer chess in general, deep blue >and the match in particular. Nonsense! > >> >>I think you owe Kasparov, the Greatest Player an apology! > >I don't owe him anything. No, your arrogance prevents that! > > >>> >>>Got any kinfolk in Canada?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.