Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question about WAC

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 23:17:03 04/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 20, 2005 at 03:22:18, Dann Corbit wrote:

>WAC 25 is a mate in 16 (or better).

It is even mate in 13 or better. But Yace could not find it from front.

1...Qh4+ 2. Kg2 Qxf6 3. Rxf8+ Kxf8 4. b4 cxb4 5. axb4 h5
6. b5 h4 7. b6 Qxb6 8. Kf2 h3 9. c5 Qxc5 10. Kg3 Qxe3+
11. Kh2 Ke7 12. Kh1 Qxe2 13. Kg1 Qg2#

> It is interesting how Shredder found and
>lost a mate in 22.

It is impressive, that it found a mate in this position. I guess, even CM would
have problems.

Regards,
Dieter




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.