Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The truth about chess programs

Author: Eric Oldre

Date: 10:03:54 04/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 22, 2005 at 06:10:40, chandler yergin wrote:

>A hypothetical challenge:
>
>To get a 'fair' playing field, and to truly test the performance of a Program
>let's not use Opening Books DataBases or EGTB's.
>
>Get a little school girl age 10 -12 who has never played chess,
>teach her the rules of the game.
>
>Now, both the Computer & the girl know the Rules.
>Have a 10 game match under Tournament time controls..
>
>Who do you think will win?

All you taught the child was the rules of the game. The program probably has
chess knowledge in it's eval that took years to figure out.

It would only be fair to cut away some of the chess knowledge of the engine too.
Give it a material only eval function. And to be really fair, only give it a
value of 1 for each piece, since the child doesn't understand the relative
values of the pieces.

If you did all that, you might have a interesting game to watch.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.