Author: chandler yergin
Date: 11:21:05 04/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2005 at 12:59:20, Dann Corbit wrote: >Computers are better tactially >Humans are better positionally > >Computers never tire and make a slip >Humans sometimes have nice long range plans > >Top level humans do not play anticomputer chess very often. > >But I think the strongest programs are probably pretty close the the strongest >humans even on a 2 GHz personal computer, which is pretty amazing. > >We don't have enough computer/human interaction to make a certain statement >about strength. But tournament results show that the best computer systems can >compete with the best humans. How about without Opening Books, DataBases & EGTB's? A Computer using all the above, a Top GM, is really playing against himself, or others with ELO's of 2700 + Why wouldn't the Computer has the edge? This rather forces a GM to play anti-computer tactics, which is not good for Theory; but makes good PR, for those interested in such a display.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.