Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 00:21:41 04/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2005 at 15:51:53, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Dear Pablo: > I respect very much your idea of how to play chess programs, but in any case it >could be considered that in fact, to win or draw them you does not play them, >really. It is like a soccer team lining his 11 players along the goal line so >the ball cannot get into it. OK, you avoid defeat, but, is it a game of soccer? >If the game consist of having a dragon facing you, the game is to fight the >dragon, not to launch to him a rocket. Let the rocket to the ocassions when it >is a real dragon, not a game with a dragon. >This is a game, Pablo, and games has sense as much as you play them in order to >take risk and give a pretty and interesting fight. >My bst >Fernando Dear Fernando. Antichess or Antiajedrez - in my humbble opinion Fernando - is the same chess that human beings have played all the time, but in the antichess the chess game is played into the other face of the same coin, like a parariel Universe....... Now, antichess is iqual to antialgorithm ...... or ..... Chess is the day ......antichess is the night........ And day + night = One day ....... For example If human beings - my humbble opinion remember I have lost many many games - are going to play games of antichess against Hydra, Shredder, Fritz, Junior, Chess Master, human beings must play like I have play ....... But if a human beings are going to play against an engine modified, like Com Quark, or against Gambit Tiger 2.0., or Rufian, or Crafty, or Fruit 2.0, will be necesary to modified the strategy for human beings and to seek other diferent antiagorithm. Chess is a battle. And in the battle only will be wining whom will be alive ....... for that reazon have not any sence tha Top chessplayers will be losting the games playing computes that they could have drew or won. Now ...... antichess principles have an absolutly diference meaning of ortodox chess concepts. For example: 1- Human being must play only in fisrt 3 lines 2- To change the King bishop 3- Not change the bad Queen bishop(better for defense) 4- Only wait and wait .... 5- To play fast and lost many times muving the same figure 6- The rook value is not better thant the knight value. Finally: There are comercial strong problems ....... Chess engines have start the way of the battle into an special algorithm or rute ,,,,,,,, for that reazon, The Top engines wont could change his algoritmh, becouse possible will be losting into WCCC, and will be out of the market.... But remember ........ "I have been thinking the chess is into a coin. And human beings have for ever played chess into a face ...... now I am playing in the other face ,,,,,, antichess...... Other face ..... And antichess is easy ..... for everyone ....... I would like to see a strong chess engine that will be disigner to play antichess ...... only in first 3 lines...... using his tactic power only for a good defense ..... thinking all the time in blocked th board..... Best regards, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.