Author: Tony Nichols
Date: 02:17:02 04/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2005 at 08:15:27, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >Hello Tony. >I am agree with you. >Human beings could win some games in ortodhox lines. >But in my "humbble opinion", human beings playing against a machine as Hydra >Scylla, I think, they there are not many chances to win a match playing across >conventional or ortodhox ways. >In next Junuary if God gave as the oportunity to see the challenger, we could >being seeing the great challenger between the great anf Top Hydra, against >great and Top human being GM MICHEAL ADAMS, from England. >But there are others problem I did not writte. >For example, an engine when is programed to destroy an special chesplayer, will >be more clouse to win to him/her, that when an engine have a general or standard >setting. >For example, COMP QUARK, into playchess, played against me 20 games the day >before yesterday, and COMP QUARK won to me 19.5 - 0.5 !! >But yesterday I drew HYDRA SCYLLA(100% better machine and engines that Quark), >and I won too, many times Top Shredders, Fritz, Junior, etc ..... Why the >lastone ? >Becouse COMP QUARK, "Thomas" have an special way in his algorithm to destroy to >me, and I have not been capable yet to understand the great Quark and Thomas >estudies. >Best regards, >Pablo Ignacio Very interesting! I don't think the top programs have any incentive to change their alorithms yet! Hopefully Micheal Adams will demonstrate what many of us already know. Regards Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.