Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which is better?

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 14:17:59 04/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 24, 2005 at 17:01:11, John Merlino wrote:

>On April 24, 2005 at 16:49:55, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On April 24, 2005 at 16:45:12, John Merlino wrote:
>>
>>>On April 24, 2005 at 16:40:26, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 24, 2005 at 16:28:06, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 24, 2005 at 15:05:41, John Merlino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On April 24, 2005 at 14:31:52, Jack Lad wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[d] 6nr/p2rkp1n/1pQRq1pp/1N2P3/8/4BN1P/PPP2PP1/2K4R w
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1.Nc7 or Nfd4?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Or can they both mate in the same number of moves?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Playing through the lines, it appears that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1.Nc7 is a Mate in 9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1.Nfd4 is a Mate in 11.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>jm
>>>>>
>>>>>3 best moves from ChessMaster 10 (AMD@3000+)
>>>>>
>>>>>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>>>>>9:38	1/13	Mate09	233251425	1.Nc7 Rxc7 2.Qxc7+ Kf8 3.Rxe6 Kg7
>>>>>					4.Nh4 Ng5 5.Bxg5 Ne7 6.Bf6+ Kh7
>>>>>					7.Qxe7 Rf8 8.Qxf8 fxe6 9.Qg7#
>>>>
>>>>You need to be careful with 1.Nc7. If CMX is anything like Ruffian, it will get
>>>>a mate score, lose it, get it again only to lose it again while shifting from a
>>>>best response to it of Rxc7, Nf8, Qf5 and Ngf6 all the while. Ruffian had a
>>>>tough time with 1.Nc7. It took 5 times longer to reach the same depth of 14 that
>>>1.Rxe6 got and ultimately lost the mate score.
>>>
>>>Chessmaster will never lose a mate score for the side to move. Once it reports a
>>>mate, the only thing it can do is possibly report a shorter mate.
>>>
>>>Therefore, my "playing with the lines" (which you comment on in another post)
>>>was merely to ensure that there was no shorter mate than the ones that The King
>>>found relatively quickly.
>>>
>>>jm
>>
>>Okay. I did not know that CM enforced the property of never losing a mate score.
>>Interesting.
>
>In my opinion, no engine should report a mate score and then say "oops, I was
>wrong, sorry...." :-)
>
>jm

I agree it is a nice property, but rather difficult to maintain if a program
makes agressive use of forward pruning. The TT can cause problems too.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.