Author: chandler yergin
Date: 07:28:16 04/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2005 at 17:51:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 24, 2005 at 16:45:55, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On April 24, 2005 at 15:54:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 24, 2005 at 12:57:12, chandler yergin wrote: >>> Even the Deep Blue team is less Biased & more realistic than you are Hyatt! http://www.southerncrossreview.org/2/chess.htm Quoting: In Scientific American, May 1996, there is an interview with the designers of DB, a parallel system with 16 nodes. "In three minutes, the time allocated for each move in a formal match, the machine can evaluate a total of about 20 billion moves; that is enough to consider every single possible move and countermove 12 sequences ahead and select lines of attack as much as 30 moves beyond that. 'The fact that this ability is still not enough to beat a mere human is amazing', Campbell [one of the six IBM prophets behind DB] says. The lesson, Hoane [another one] adds, is that masters such as Kasparov 'are doing some mysterious computation that we can't figure out.'" >>>What does that have to do with anything? three minutes +/- X, where X can be up >>>to 15-20 minutes based on actually playing games against Deep Thought and deep >>>blue prototype... >>> >>>Times vary wildly. For _all_ programs. >>> >>>Go read something, or talk to someone, or do something to improve your knowledge >>>about computer chess. Shoot, even sitting on a rock alone will probably do >>>that... your knowledge is so near zero at the moment... >> >>You'd sure like to think so wouldn't you? > > >That's the difference between you and I (at least one of them). > >You "think" while I "know". > >big difference. Please tell me what your response has to do with what I Posted? Thanks, Chan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.