Author: Steve Glanzfeld
Date: 10:00:06 04/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2005 at 12:50:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > An interesting idea you have presented here. On the > other hand: such problems (time losses) if one plays > with the Fischer clock modud (4m+2s). Hi. I don't think Fischer tc should be a problem. The key is: A program must understand that it should "unbalance" the position and create a chance to increase it's evals, even from a somewhat lower level, rather than to lose on time with an endless number of "perfect" moves which don't result in significant evaluation improvement. It is difficult, because it means that the program should choose a move which leads to a lower evaluation by "conservative" methods. I'm not sure if programs can ever be able to understand moves like RxN (because, NOT playing RxN is based on deep calculation too!). I hope that programmers like Prof. Hyatt will tell us their opinion about this. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.