Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:17:08 04/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2005 at 13:35:01, Matthew Hull wrote: >On April 25, 2005 at 10:56:07, chandler yergin wrote: > >>I think we have to overlook the Naive thinking here. >> >>The Computer is using the latest Theory from the Top Grandmaster games. >> >>Those are in it's DataBase and Opening Books. >> >>Which is what an Opening book is... >> >>Positions from games played. >> >>For any GM Like Kasparov or Anand or Krammnik to play 'against' a Computer, >>they are competing with their own play. > > >They do anyway, since human opponents memorize the same stuff computers >memorize. > >Where is your brain? > > > >>Now, they have a choice here.. >> >>1. Do they want to play their best lines from their home analysis, and broadcast >>those to the world? I think not.. >> >>Therefore, they play 'anti' Computer Chess, till the Computer is 'out' >>of the Book, then it's an even playing field. >> >>This is not good for Chess! >> >>If you think a Computer 'without' an Opening Book, & EGTB's, >>can compete against even a Master, you are sadly mistaken. > > >If the master can also "forget" his opening book, then it would be even. > >Again, where is your brain? Can't refute what I write can you? Never could ..never will I have a brain, I use it... Therefor you cannot compete! Don't try and be a Wit.. when you are only half qualified! ;) Cy > > > >> >> >>Have you considered that Swampland in Florida .. for investing? >> >>No, Humans are not toast.. they are the Cream of the Crop!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.