Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 14:27:16 04/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2005 at 16:56:35, Martin Baumung wrote:
>[White "Shredder 9 UCI"]
>[Black "Yace 0.99.87"]
>[Result "1-0"]
Hardly, a big surprise, Shredder is so much better. I fear, Yace would also lose
with white. In self play, Yace vs. Yace - white won. This may show even more the
unrealistic eval of the position.
Regrads,
Dieter
Not finished yet, but the result is clear:
[Event "Computer chess game 40 3600 +0 0 0"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.04.25"]
[Round "1"]
[White "?"]
[Black "Yace 0.99.87b"]
[Result "*"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "r1bqkb1r/pp1n1pp1/2p1Nn1p/8/3P4/3B1N2/PPP2PPP/R1BQK2R b KQkq - 0 8"]
[WhiteElo "0"]
[BlackElo "0"]
[Timecontrol "40 3600 +0 0 0"]
[Time "Mon Apr 25 23:25:58 2005"]
8...Qe7 {0.89/13 0.00s} 9. O-O {-0.87/13 123.85s} fxe6 {0.87/12 147.60s} 10.
Bg6+ {-0.83/12 124.71s} (10. Qe2) 10...Kd8 {0.83/13 108.96s} 11. c4
{-0.83/12 88.14s} Qb4 {0.81/12 90.30s} 12. c5 {-0.86/11 44.23s} (12. Qe2) 12.
Be7 {0.84/11 90.30s} 13. Qc2 {-0.50/12 52.65s} (13. Re1) 13...Qa5
{0.47/12 90.30s} 14. Bd2 {-0.54/12 90.41s} Qc7 {0.54/12 90.31s} 15. Rfe1
{-0.45/12 90.41s} (15. Rae1) 15...Nd5 {0.53/12 61.02s} 16. Rxe6
{-0.48/12 82.81s} N7f6 {0.50/11 91.22s} 17. Ree1 {-0.52/11 90.64s} Rf8
{0.52/11 91.22s} 18. h3 {-0.51/11 90.65s} Nd7 {0.47/11 50.64s} 19. Be4
{-0.41/11 57.37s} Nf4 {0.33/11 80.64s} 20. Rad1 {-0.30/11 81.95s} g5
{-0.33/11 465.26s} (20...Nf6) 21. Ne5 {0.33/11 92.14s} Nxe5 {-0.09/11 44.16s}
(21...Bf6) 22. Bxf4 {0.40/11 92.14s} Rxf4 {-1.54/13 323.85s} 23. dxe5+
{2.94/12 92.14s} Ke8 {-3.43/12 44.67s} 24. Bg6+ {3.43/11 92.14s} Kf8
{-3.43/12 72.01s} 25. g3 {3.36/12 92.29s} Rf3 {-3.43/12 70.90s} 26. Bh5
{3.70/11 92.14s} *
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.