Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:50:59 04/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2005 at 20:34:19, pavel wrote: >First 1000 Games: >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Aristarch 4.50 : 2519 19 19 1000 55.4 % 2481 23.3 % > 2 Yace Paderborn : 2481 19 19 1000 44.6 % 2519 23.3 % > > >Individual statistics: > >1 Aristarch 4.50 : 2519 1000 (+437,=233,-330), 55.4 % > >Yace Paderborn : 1000 (+437,=233,-330), 55.4 % > >2 Yace Paderborn : 2481 1000 (+330,=233,-437), 44.6 % > >Aristarch 4.50 : 1000 (+330,=233,-437), 44.6 % >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >All games (so far 5004 games): >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Aristarch 4.50 : 2516 8 8 5004 54.7 % 2484 23.9 % > 2 Yace Paderborn : 2484 8 8 5004 45.3 % 2516 23.9 % > > >Individual statistics: > >1 Aristarch 4.50 : 2516 5004 (+2140,=1196,-1668), 54.7 % > >Yace Paderborn : 5004 (+2140,=1196,-1668), 54.7 % > >2 Yace Paderborn : 2484 5004 (+1668,=1196,-2140), 45.3 % > >Aristarch 4.50 : 5004 (+1668,=1196,-2140), 45.3 % > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >At one point I thought the positional learning was really helping YACE (it did >good in 3rd and 4th 1000 games). But now it seems that the overall differance is >negligable since the first 1000 games. I will run another 5000 than I will stop. > >pavs It is interesting that you chose two programs that are very close in strength. At this point, it is still hard to be sure which one is actually stonger. So in this particular case, the entire experiment will be needed to resolve the question.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.