Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:32:54 04/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2005 at 16:01:16, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 26, 2005 at 15:42:17, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>It is difficult to be more clear and logic, but I doubt very much your piece of >>reasoning will convice people prone to see intrigues and complots all around. >>For me it was clear from the beginning Mr Kasparov, with an ego greater than the >>Empire State, was too much off set to say anything with common sense after his >>defeat. >>He is a paranoid personality, full of vanity. A genius, but also all that... >>Fdo > > >This is a shame to say. > >Kasparov didn't come up with his questions AFTER he had lost the show event but >already after game 2. Please at least try to consider the facts and don't make >false allegations. > >As to the ego. There is no human creativity without magnitudes of ego! Let me remind you of two things. 1. Game two he expressed concern that "no computer would play this move..." 2. In that _same_ game he resigned in a drawn position... Seems that he made _two_ mistakes in that game...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.