Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov [HBR interview] : 'IBM committed a crime against science.'

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 20:02:46 04/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 26, 2005 at 13:14:57, Pedro Gomes wrote:

>On April 26, 2005 at 11:10:03, Steven Edwards wrote:
>
>
>>Lack of public games does not equate with fakery.  Yes, it was not a symmetric
>>relation as the Deep Blue team had all of Kasparov's past games.  But Kasparov
>>knew this prior to signing the match contract.  Apparently the lack of public
>>games didn't bother him then; his whining and false allegations shouldn't bother
>>us now.
>
>We couldn´t see it in this intrview, but I thought the principal problem (from
>the human standpoint) was the changing of Diep Blue´s playing parameters between
>games - some kind of changing of peronalities - wich were happening without
>Kasparov´s knowledge, and wich confused him, because his opponents was emulating
>many diferent styles. Am I wrong ?

No! The Parameters were changed after every game..
>
>PG



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.