Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 03:54:31 04/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2005 at 13:55:29, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >Hello Jonas, Eduard, and Thomas. > > >A little reflexive idea with regard for you and chesslife. > >Antichess or "Antiajedrez technique" - in my humbble opinion - is the top way to >beat Top engines, since I have had memory playing by myself engines(Chess >Challenger No 7 first Semester year 1980) >Antiajedrez is a perfect sistem to have a draw or to beat by "stress"(256) top >engines in standard settings, in each time control that human beings to >play(antichess in blocking direction becouse there are many other kind of >anti-algorithm rutes) >I have sayed about antichess is like a "perfect sistem" becouse its could be use >sistematically playing human beings black, or playing white, in a 20-60% final >score. >Many V.I.P. have thought this way(antichess technique) is like a trick, ery, or >like a joke, or a stupied thing. >But I am real sorry for they(humbble opinion with out apoloxia) becouse they are >far away of the truth and about the state of science computer art, and are going >to be more and more thoughtful or pensive, day per day, with the "TOP CONJURING" >Thomas Mayer, writter or "Comp Quark,s Author " has an incredible score in >playchess playing in main room, and he is doing one footprint in front of others >warriors. >He(Thomas) is walking his own rute, maybe like Tiger gambit 2.0., crafty, >rufian, and others agresive modules. >Quark is clouse to be 100% playing against human beings in mein room, and >they(Top Chess players and V.I.P.) look as afraid becouse usaually dont are >playing Quark! >I have not been capable to understand "Quark yet" ..... and "Comp Quark style" >I think Mayer is like a performer or representativ of a new chess age. >And I am afraid THEY(others human beings) are going to MAY BE LATE to the battle >MAN vs MACHINE. >Finally ............... Some days ago I put a poste here where I did invite >programers to build a "PERFECT ANTICHESS ENGINE" playing and playing for ever >avoid to be lost, blocking and blocking the game in first three lines in >contraction rute. >I wonder, when many Top human beings chess players are going to play into >engines room of playchess, and when are going to start to turn(around) the coin >of chess history, and to play into the other face of the battle, where have >they played ever a World Chess Champion Ship. >If human beings want to know how beat a tiger must to figth the tiger. >I hope to see a great battle in next Great Top G.M. Michael Adams from England >versus Super Computer Hydra engine. >A battle where Hydra to atack with all his power like a tiger, and where the >human being to refuse the hydras claw, like David versus Goliat battle. >Best regards, >Pablo Ignacio Restrepo My question was very simple: "Can you get the same results playing against the computers at longer time controls?" and a simple yes or no would do. Also i don't see how you can go through 17 games with one draw and then call your system "perfect". Anyway my dad had figured out in the late seventies to play the stonewall against the university computer and developed opening systems with both white and black against chess programs that got gradually stronger and stronger throughtout the eighties, he then later showed me how to beat Chessmaster 5500 (the only chess program i had when i started playing) with these "systems". But he also told me that, though the systems was real, they where just a trick in essence compared to real chess and i agree as the only thing you are doing depends on you knowing that the computer does not understand some basic aspects of the game. In order to get better as a chessplayer you have to play the game as a whole and not just use "systems".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.