Author: Jay Scott
Date: 13:27:55 04/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2005 at 18:37:50, Michael Yee wrote: >On April 27, 2005 at 16:10:13, Jay Scott wrote: >>Unlikely to be a big win, because existing heuristics are highly successful. > >I guess it'd still be interesting (for me personally) to see if the automatic >method's performance could match the existing heuristics. In any case, move >ordering could be handled alongside the extension/reduction task. Most of the benefit comes from extremely simple rules like "play the best move from the transposition table" and "play winning captures". There's just not much room to play around in. Jay
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.