Author: Graham Banks
Date: 03:33:10 04/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2005 at 06:01:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 28, 2005 at 22:58:03, Graham Banks wrote: > >>KNOCKOUT TOURNAMENT >> >>Pentium 3 450 >>Deep Fritz 8 GUI >>Each engine using 64mb hash >>3 and 4 men EGTB >>Perfect 7.0 book for all >>Ponder off >>40 moves in 20 minutes repeating >>Each match consists of 20 games >> >> >>ROUND ONE MATCHES (after Game 5 of 20) >> >>(1.0-4.0) Anaconda 2.0.1 v Toga II 0.93 >>(2.5-2.5) CM9000 Slayer 2b v CM9000 Slayer >>(2.0-3.0) CM10th Schumacher v Junior 9 >>(3.0-2.0) SlowChess Blitz v CM10th Milan 2.4 >>(2.5-2.5) CM10th Emperor v Pro Deo 1.1 >>(0.5-4.5) Deep Sjeng 1.6 v CM9000 Gladiator >>(4.0-1.0) CM9000 Minotaur v Deep Fritz 8 >>(4.0-1.0) Ruffian 2.1.0 v CM10th D2Alos >>(3.5-1.5) CM10th Berean 5.53 v SOS 5 >>(1.0-4.0) Chess Tiger 15 v CM9000 Mv2.5 >>(3.5-1.5) CM9000 Apex v Gandalf 6.0 >>(2.0-3.0) Pharaon 3.2 v CM10th Medusa >>(2.5-2.5) CM10th Milan 1.5 v Patriot 1.3.0 >>(0.5-4.5) Hiarcs 9 v CM10th Yoda 2.7 >>(1.5-3.5) CM9000 R1 v CM9000 TO5 >>(2.0-3.0) Shredder 9 v Aristarch 4.50 >> >>One thing that is obvious at present is that the top CM9000 settings seem to be >>outperforming their CM10th counterparts. This is a bit of a worry! > > >I don't think that it has to do with the settings, since the Default CM9000 is a >little bit stronger than the Default CM10th. > >Jorge Hmmm - I'd have to disagree with you on that one Jorge. I think that CM10th Default is stronger than CM9000 Default. I think that we were able to improve a lot on CM9000 Default, but it's not so easy making a similarly big improvement on CM10th Default. Therefore my concern is that the best CM9000 settings could be better than the best CM10th settings we've come up with to date, Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.