Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is it called static evaluation? Because it is.

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 04:45:31 04/29/05

Go up one level in this thread

On April 29, 2005 at 06:20:32, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>
>
>>My point again.. and I have Posted it several times.
>>
>>"If your Engine cannot find the Mate; you can spin your hard drive for weeks
>>and it doesn't matter. You cannot rely on a "Static Eval" in a quiet
>>position.
>
>?
>
>this depends how good your static evaluation is.
>
>Of course evaluation can be trusted in quiet AND in non-quiet positions,
>sometimes better than search can be trusted. i wonder why you believe different.

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?422595

• example 3: Thorsten Czub 07:26:30 04/30/05
• example Thorsten Czub 05:27:14 04/29/05
  • Re: example Ed Schröder 00:42:28 04/30/05
    • Re: example Thorsten Czub 06:57:18 04/30/05
  • Re: example CSTal Rolf Tueschen 05:34:38 04/29/05
    • Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:51:04 04/29/05
      • Re: example CSTal Rolf Tueschen 17:31:08 04/29/05
        • Re: example CSTal Fernando Villegas 10:17:33 04/30/05
        • Re: example CSTal Tony Petters 04:53:33 04/30/05
          • Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:44:01 04/30/05
        • Re: example CSTal Uri Blass 02:12:32 04/30/05
          • Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:36:24 04/30/05
• Re: Why is it called static evaluation? Because it is. Thorsten Czub 05:14:12 04/29/05
  • Re: Why is it called static evaluation? Because it is. Rolf Tueschen 05:28:39 04/29/05

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.