Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: example CSTal

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 05:34:38 04/29/05

Go up one level in this thread

On April 29, 2005 at 08:27:14, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>The programmer and operator did not believed into the situation and continued
>and continued the game. he hoped that CSTal would FORGET about the law.
>but it could not. it was in the static knowledge of CSTAL.

Isn't it a good compliment for Chris Whittington and his work? Now the million
dollar question: why nobody else did continue this paradigma? Other question:
was that game you quoted the exception of a normally losing trend? Or still
another question: would such a program, like CSTal, if it would have been
improved, be still a good rival to the search monsters today? Just for
reminiscence...

• Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:51:04 04/29/05
  • Re: example CSTal Rolf Tueschen 17:31:08 04/29/05
    • Re: example CSTal Fernando Villegas 10:17:33 04/30/05
    • Re: example CSTal Tony Petters 04:53:33 04/30/05
      • Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:44:01 04/30/05
    • Re: example CSTal Uri Blass 02:12:32 04/30/05
      • Re: example CSTal Thorsten Czub 06:36:24 04/30/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.