Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:50:52 04/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2005 at 07:43:13, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On April 28, 2005 at 20:02:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >[...ยจ] >>Intel has simply lost the performance battle until start of 2007 for >>desktopprocessors and objective comparisions like these show it real clear. >> >>Even if intel comes by end 2006 with a good replacement for the P4, by then >>every normal computer user will realize that intel sucks and AMD is fast, so the >>damage intel has done to itself in the desktop market is one of long term. >[...] > > For the average PC user this all is of no interest. To > work with Word & Co. a PC 486 would still do the same > job. And so the damage Intel has done to itself does > not count much because only few people require (or mean > to require) a top speed computer. > Kurt But the public will still opt for AMD because they do not like to hear they are using a slow P4.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.