Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:17:02 04/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2005 at 08:50:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On April 29, 2005 at 07:43:13, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On April 28, 2005 at 20:02:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>[...ยจ]
>>>Intel has simply lost the performance battle until start of 2007 for
>>>desktopprocessors and objective comparisions like these show it real clear.
>>>
>>>Even if intel comes by end 2006 with a good replacement for the P4, by then
>>>every normal computer user will realize that intel sucks and AMD is fast, so the
>>>damage intel has done to itself in the desktop market is one of long term.
>>[...]
>>
>> For the average PC user this all is of no interest. To
>> work with Word & Co. a PC 486 would still do the same
>> job. And so the damage Intel has done to itself does
>> not count much because only few people require (or mean
>> to require) a top speed computer.
>> Kurt
>
>But the public will still opt for AMD because they do not like to hear they are
>using a slow P4.
True
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.