Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 13:13:28 04/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2005 at 05:23:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >The impression of the chess players after the match was that DBII was not better >than Kasparov at 1997 inspite of the results. > You are right Uri, but I've never seen the other side (Bob) say that DB was better than Kasparov. Apparently some must feel that a 6 game match somehow "proves" who is better and they feel a need to vindicate Kasparov. As Bob has said, all it proves is who was better for those 6 games. Dan H.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.