Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: example CSTal

Author: Tony Petters

Date: 04:53:33 04/30/05

Go up one level in this thread


On April 29, 2005 at 20:31:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>But let me make a prophetic statement. For all what I know from chess and
>computerchess I am convinced that the brutal search approach - on the base of
>always stronger hardware - will be condemned to come to a dead situation where
>no longer effective progress in chess will be possible. And if the programmers
>don't understand how to improve the chess knowledge for the machine, then they
>will never overcome human top chessplayers. In special if certain limiting rules will be found for the attending machines. At that moment then people will be
>sorry that in the years around 1997 those who followed the other paradigma
>(knowledge) like Chris and his team  had no better support in their peer group!
>
>It's a pity for that waste of creativity because of silly flame wars on the
>internet...
>
>Hold open your eyes and inform the community about any small development when
>someone new or old gets into the knowledge issue again - for the best of
>computerchess! And don't let you become depressed. You once were part of the
>better issue in computerchess. All the best to you in future!

But Pope, what is the programmer is a 1600 ELO patzer like Bobo, how can they
improve chess knowledge ?

Where is ChrisW these days ?

Interesting, that Shredder 9 would announce it is updating to Winx64 today.
Another bean counter programmer, but against HYDRA, it cannot out count the
beans !





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.