Author: Steven J. Brann
Date: 18:55:49 05/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2005 at 21:31:00, Steven J. Brann wrote: >On May 03, 2005 at 19:34:02, Tom Brake wrote: > >>[d]r1b2rk1/ppq1b1pp/n1p2p2/7R/3BNN2/6QP/PPP3P1/2K4R w - - 0 1 >> >>1. Rxh7!!!! Kxh7 2. Qg6+ Kg8 3. Nh5 Bd8 4. Rf1 Rf7 5. Bxf6! Nb4 ( seen by the >>silicon, turns out it's literally the only move that doesn't lose on the spot, >>and also threatens perpetual after Nxa2+, Nc3+ due to the exposed White king. >>and so White almost has to play ... ) > >CM10th with a custom personality on a P4 3.4G HT machine struggles a bit with >this one but ultimately gets there. > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/5 0.44 27950 1.Qb3+ Rf7 2.Rf1 Qd7 3.Ne2 Qe6 >0:00 1/6 0.54 97833 1.Qb3+ Rf7 2.Rf1 Qd7 3.Rd1 Bd6 4.g3 >0:01 1/7 0.37 290280 1.Qb3+ Rf7 2.Rf1 Qd7 3.Bc3 f5 4.Ng5 > Bxg5 5.Rxg5 >0:05 1/8 0.49 1161429 1.Qb3+ Rf7 2.Rf1 Qd7 3.Bc3 Qe8 > 4.Kb1 g6 5.Rh6 >0:12 1/9 0.39 2979906 1.Qb3+ Rf7 2.Rf1 Qd7 3.Be3 b6 4.Kb1 > Bb4 5.a3 Bf8 >0:36 1/9 0.97 8545172 1.Rf1 c5 2.Qd3 Nb4 3.Qc4+ Rf7 4.Bxc5 > f5 5.Qxb4 fxe4 6.Bxe7 Qxe7 >1:17 2/10 1.01 18949589 1.Rf1 Bd8 2.Qd3 h6 3.Ng6 Rf7 4.Qc4 > b5 5.Qb3 Qd7 >3:26 2/11 1.58 52469020 1.Rf1 Bd8 2.Rxh7 Bf5 3.Ng6 Kxh7 > 4.Nxf8+ Kg8 5.Nd6 Bxh3 6.gxh3 Kxf8 >7:19 2/12 1.51 116850970 1.Rf1 Bd8 2.Re1 Bd7 3.Qb3+ Rf7 > 4.g3 Rc8 5.Rxh7 Bf5 6.Rh5 Qa5 7.Rd1 >10:34 2/12 2.04 163294994 1.Re1 c5 2.Bc3 Bd6 3.Nxd6 Qxd6 > 4.Qh4 h6 5.Rxh6 gxh6 6.Qg3+ Bg4 > 7.Qxg4+ Kh8 8.Ng6+ Kg8 9.Nxf8+ Kxf8 [D]r1b2rk1/ppq1b1pR/n1p2p2/8/3BNN2/6QP/PPP3P1/2K4R b - - 0 1 Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:00 1/5 -4.17 45809 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kh8 3.Qh5+ Kg8 4.Ng6 Re8 5.Rd1 0:00 1/6 -3.87 104164 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kh8 3.Nh5 Bb4 4.Nhxf6 gxf6 5.Bxf6+ Rxf6 6.Nxf6 0:01 1/7 -2.67 238450 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Rf7 4.Rf1 f5 5.Nxg7 f4 0:01 1/8 -1.62 429640 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Rf7 4.Rf1 Kf8 5.Qh7 Bd6 6.Nxd6 Qxd6 7.Qh8+ Ke7 8.Nxg7 0:03 1/9 -1.62 1048357 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Rf7 4.Rf1 Kf8 5.Qh7 Bd6 6.Nxd6 Qxd6 7.Qh8+ Ke7 8.Nxg7 0:10 2/10 -1.50 2892935 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Bd8 4.Rf1 c5 5.Nexf6+ Bxf6 6.Nxf6+ Rxf6 7.Bxf6 Qf7 8.Qg3 0:26 2/11 -0.92 7659032 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Bd8 4.Rf1 c5 5.Nexf6+ Bxf6 6.Nxf6+ Rxf6 7.Qe8+ Kh7 8.Bxf6 Qd7 9.Qe4+ Kg8 1:18 2/12 -0.53 22978345 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Bd8 4.Rf1 c5 5.Rxf6 Rf7 6.Nxg7 Bxf6 7.Ne6+ Bg7 8.Nxc7 Nxc7 9.Bxg7 Rxg7 3:46 3/13 0.00 68426944 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Bd8 4.Rf1 Rf7 5.Nxg7 Rxg7 6.Nxf6+ Bxf6 7.Qe8+ Kh7 8.Qh5+ Kg8 9.Qe8+ 13:45 3/14 1.11 239975192 1...Kxh7 2.Qg6+ Kg8 3.Nh5 Bd8 4.Rf1 Rf7 5.Bxf6 Nb4 6.Nxg7 Nxa2+ 7.Kb1 Nc3+ 8.Nxc3 Bxf6 9.Nf5+ Kf8 10.Nh6 Bxc3 11.Qxf7+ Qxf7 12.Rxf7+ Ke8 13.bxc3 After forcing Rxh7, CM10th sees a lower score for white than Re1 above. Perhaps it's one of those situations where the beast just needs more grunt time than I was willing to invest in it. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.