Author: Graham Banks
Date: 00:05:54 05/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2005 at 02:53:56, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 04, 2005 at 02:18:29, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On May 03, 2005 at 19:04:48, Jason Kent wrote: >> >>>Cycle 5 final! Halfway done! Shredder did very well this cycle. >>> >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Yoda 2.7-- 2.5 - 2.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Wrath----- 4.0 - 1.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Tsunami--- 1.5 - 3.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Steadfast- 2.5 - 2.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Solomon--- 3.5 - 1.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX SoFar----- 2.5 - 2.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Schumacher 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX R2D2------ 4.5 - 0.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX R1X------- 2.0 - 3.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Predator-- 5.0 - 0.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Milan 2.4- 2.5 - 2.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Milan 2.3- 1.5 - 3.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Milan 2.1- 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Milan 1.5- 4.0 - 1.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Medusa---- 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Default--- 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX DarthVader 3.5 - 1.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX D2Alos---- 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX D1Pyr----- 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX D1Meandros 3.5 - 1.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Creep----- 4.0 - 1.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Cobra----- 3.5 - 1.5 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX C3PO------ 4.0 - 1.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Berean5.53 3.0 - 2.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CMX Beast----- 2.0 - 3.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CM9_Slayer2B-- 4.0 - 1.0 >>>Shredder 9 UCI - CM9_Minotaur-- 2.5 - 2.5 >>> >>> >>>http://www.cacsi.com/chess/S9Gauntlet-CMX!.zip >>>(updated May 3, 7:00 pm EST) >> >> >>Hi Jason, >> >>some very interesting results at this early stage! Milan 2.3 seems to be a good >>allround setting. Let's see if it can maintain its performance, >> >>Regards, Graham. > > Hi Graham > It's perhaps too early to conclude something in view > of the very small number of games played so far in > each of these matches. I think we all agree that none > of these settings will have a chance to win a match > vs Shredder 9 over 50-100 games :-) Nevertheless a > most interesting test by Jason (it would be useful > to increase the number of games to 40 for each match > and I hope Jason will have enough time to do that). > Kurt I agree 100%, but I doubt that Jason would be prepared to give up that much computer time as it becomes a real chore to run so many games at such a time control, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.