Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 06:28:39 05/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2005 at 08:56:22, James Swafford wrote: >On May 04, 2005 at 00:22:34, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>On May 03, 2005 at 21:16:18, Steven Edwards wrote: >> >>>On May 03, 2005 at 15:59:00, Matthew Hull wrote: >>>>On May 03, 2005 at 12:39:12, Steven Edwards wrote: >>> >>>>>Symbolic's toolkit is not strong enough on my available hardware to have much >>>>>chance to place in the upper half of the field, although it would be interesting >>>>>to see some of the games. >>>> >>>>I'd be willing to bet it would be competitive on the latest Mac hardware. Their >>>>might even be volunteers willing to offer the use of their 64-bit hardware if >>>>you decided to enter the competition. >>>> >>>>It might be worth looking into. Someone here might be willing to build the >>>>toolkit on 64-bit Mac and run some benchmarks, or even do some runs on ICC. >>> >>>Eventually I'll get a 64 bit machine and handle this myself as it would likely >>>take many iterations for optimal adjustments in the program. It's possible that >>>this will happen in time for CCT8. (Has it been scheduled yet?) >> >> >>Are you kidding? They barely got 2005 scheduled with only 4 months notice. >>They have no clue about 2006, much less 2008. >> >>It's a travesty, IMHO. Big hardware projects need much more notice than 4 >>months to get equipment and testing ready. Not only do they need time for these >>things, but they really need hard dates and times, preferably at least six >>months in advance, for scheduling. Computer time on big hardware is not cheap, >>nor is it easy to get the hardware on the dates and times it will be needed. >>Surely ICGA are aware of this. But maybe they don't care. You would think >>they are deliberately favoring the microcomputer software vendors by making the >>event with such short notice, so that it's less likely a competitive >>big-hardware project will interfere with the desired marketing results. I don't >>know that this is a factor, but it looks suspicious. >> > > >I think you were thinking Steven was asking about the next WCCC, >but he was asking about CCT. Ooops. That's what I get for posting after my bed time. :-\ Sorry, Steven. >I guess your point still stands, >though... it was scheduled with even less notice. > > > >> >> >>>Also, there is >>>plenty of other work to be done on the program that's more important than 64 bit >>>optimization.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.