Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:01:39 05/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2005 at 15:34:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >So I don't buy his "I didn't think the machine would make a mistake." nonsense >because it implies he knows something that he couldn't possibly know. I've seen >_many_ games on ICC where Crafty was a piece ahead but forced to take a >perpetual to avoid getting killed... Err - sorry, but I don't quite understand your speech here. You're saying that - you was a piece ahead, so with +2 at least on your screen? - then YOU were forced to TAKE (?) - you mean to allow? - a perpetual? - because (??) you SAW that if you played on your advantage (visible trough the +2) would in the end mean losing the game??????????? And you are talking about CRAFTY who's seeing this???? Excuse me, but I'm not believing in the supernatural of THAT idea... BTW this time I will take this through to the end. I'm not interested in draws, this argument I will transform into a clear win! ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.