Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 17:43:41 05/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2005 at 22:04:47, chandler yergin wrote: >On April 28, 2005 at 22:03:37, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On April 28, 2005 at 16:52:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 28, 2005 at 16:31:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>No >>>> >>>>I think that it is the companies who do not want them to create anti computer >>>>chess. >>>> >>>>Otherwise they will give the following conditions: >>>> >>>>If you win a match of 6 games you get million dollar. >>>>If you do not win the match you get nothing and the next best player who agree >>>>to play against chess programs is playing a match against the program. >>>> >>>>Continue this process until the human win a match or until there are no more >>>>players with rating above 2500 that agree to play a match. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>I like you for your independent thought production! Thanks for the input, Uri. I >>>agree. The point is the players wouldn't like to play under these conditions I >>>fear. >> >> >>I like Nabokov's comment in his book "The Defense" >> >>"...for what else in the world exists besides chess?" > >I also like Lasker.. >"On the chessboard, lies & hypocracy do not exist" 1. Lasker didn't know the tricks of computerchess. 2. Nabokov wasn't a scientist. Of course science is worthier than chess. By lengths.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.