Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:51:43 05/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2005 at 07:29:24, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Franz, > >On May 05, 2005 at 07:14:25, F. Huber wrote: > >>On May 05, 2005 at 06:46:39, Martin Baumung wrote: >> >>>On May 05, 2005 at 06:36:29, Karl-Heinz Söntges wrote: >>> >>>>Patriot 2.0 SSE.exe >>>> >>>> 84,0 KB (86.016 Bytes) >>>> >>>>fruit_linux >>>> >>>> 84,0 KB (86.016 Bytes) >>> >>> >>>What kind of proof is that supposed to be? >>> >>>Martin >> >>I´ve never heard such a nonsense before! >> >>MSWSOCK.DLL (86.016 Bytes) ... Win98 system file from 15.5.1998 >> >>So it´s clear: both chess engines above are simply clones of this 6 years old >>system file from Microsoft ... :-) > >fully agreed -> but I believe they have other proofs... because a comparison of >fruit_linux and and a windows executeable does really make no sense... > >funny is, that the guy which usually spits in the face of those people which >found a clone now has himself a clone problem... > >Greets, Thomas > >P.S.: Anyway, I still have my doubts about Patriot to be a clone - it simply >does not fit to what I was thinking so far about Vladimir... but well, who >knows. All Vladimir can say about it is: "I will not read this forum, and speak about clone" see http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67213/messages/4755.htm I think that you can expect different behaviour from somebody that his code is not based on fruit's code. If he does not want to discuss the subject in public he could say: "Patriot2 is not a clone but I am not going to discuss about it and people who think that it is a clone should give a convincing evidence for it." I did not see an evidence that it is a clone but I guess that the evidence was deleted. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.