Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The case against Patriot

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 00:32:08 05/06/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 06, 2005 at 02:18:28, Robert Hollay wrote:

>Please, excuse me if this sounds too naive.
>But aren't there any (trustworthy) authorities who could
>contact Vladimir Yelin personally to have a look at the sources of Patriot 2.0 ?
>If he is really innocent he shouldn't refuse that.
>At least, he has nothing to lose, because the future of Patriot 2.0 is
>very uncertain now ...
>
>Robert

This is the problem.
It seems that most of the programmers have no trustworthy authority.

Note that I have no objection that all the programmers who release new program
will have to give their source to trustworthy authority but I am afraid that it
will be impossible to persuade programmers of
Shredder,Fritz,Junior,Hiarcs,Chessmaster,Ktulu,Sjeng to do it.

The only solution that I see is if there is going to be a new law that releasing
a program without sending the source to some accepted authority is against the
law and treated the same as piracy and if you even try to make money from it you
will be treated the same as somebody who copy programs by piracy and sell them.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.