Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 10:42:05 05/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2005 at 13:05:37, Pallav Nawani wrote: >On May 06, 2005 at 12:12:56, Brian Kostick wrote: > >>On May 06, 2005 at 11:24:24, Alex Schmidt wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>after some Mails with Fabien and Frank we decided that some of the proves about >>>Patriot 2.0 must be available for the public. >>> >>>I am not happy in doing so but here it is: >>> >>>http://www.uciengines.de/UCI-Engines/Patriot/Patriot2/patriot2.html >>> >>>Best, >>>Alex >> >> >>I don't see it as wrong behavior. If you feel he has used GPL'ed code then you >>are free to ask for a copy and he is required to make it available. Otherwise I >>see some sort of credit or disclosure as only a honorary, not compulsory, thing. >>BK > >If you use GPL code in your program, you must: >(a) License your own program as GPL, >(b) State in your License/Somewhere about the the program whose code you are >using, >(c) Either make the Source Code available, or state in your documentation that >you will make it available if asked to do so. > >There is nothing honorary here. >Pallav I'm glad we agree, but already you might assume he violates the GPL. I did not make that assumption. I suggested that you ask for a copy and he should give it if the code is GPL'ed. Too many reverse engineers and CCC clone police go public before trying the simple method. BK
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.