Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:09:00 05/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2005 at 05:48:05, Graham Banks wrote: >Hmmm - Chess Tiger 2004 is proving tougher than I expected. However I'll still >back Pro Deo 1.1 to take this one out, even at the risk of having to eat humble >pie! Chess Tiger 2004 is not having the same bad luck the as CMth Emperor :-) (7.0-9.0) CM10th Emperor v Pro Deo 1.1 Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.