Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 07:31:11 05/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2005 at 02:00:17, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 08, 2005 at 01:15:43, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On May 07, 2005 at 20:15:54, Steven Edwards wrote: >> >>>WCSAC.0062 >>> >>>[D] r1bq1rk1/pp2bp1p/2p2np1/3p2B1/3P4/2NQ2N1/PPP2PPP/4RRK1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Book: Rxe7 >>> >>>Toolkit: Qe2 Be6 f4 Bd6 f5 Bd7 Qd3 Kh8 Nce2 (+0.281) >> >> >>Rxe7 is the correct move. >> >>Rxe7 Qxe7 Qf3 Kg7 Nce4 +- >>Rxe7 Qxe7 Qf3 Bg4 Qxf6 Qxf6 Bxf6 +- >> >>Maybe +- is a bit too harsh in the 2nd line, but Black's position is quite bad. >> >> >>-Peter > >+- is not too harsh in the second line. >2 knights against rook is decisive advantage and programs should give it a >lscore near +2 pawns for the knights. > >Uri > I agree. It just seems like a slightly smaller advantage than normally results from these test positions. -Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.