Author: Graham Banks
Date: 11:45:35 05/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2005 at 07:09:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 08, 2005 at 05:48:05, Graham Banks wrote: > >>Hmmm - Chess Tiger 2004 is proving tougher than I expected. However I'll still >>back Pro Deo 1.1 to take this one out, even at the risk of having to eat humble >>pie! > > >Chess Tiger 2004 is not having the same bad luck the as CMth Emperor :-) > >(7.0-9.0) CM10th Emperor v Pro Deo 1.1 > >Jorge LOL - beware the Emperor!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.